On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
On 13-07-22 03:52 AM, Lee Jones wrote:Cc: Christian Daudt <csd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Hi Lee,
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
index 67ec524..fdace5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
@@ -27,18 +27,18 @@
status = "okay";
};
- sdio0: sdio@0x3f180000 {
+ sdio0: sdio@3f180000 {
max-frequency = <48000000>;
status = "okay";
};
- sdio1: sdio@0x3f190000 {
+ sdio1: sdio@3f190000 {
non-removable;
max-frequency = <48000000>;
status = "okay";
};
- sdio3: sdio@0x3f1b0000 {
+ sdio3: sdio@3f1b0000 {
max-frequency = <48000000>;
status = "okay";
};
Is this convention documented ? Someone called my attention to the
fact that this dts files was inconsistent in its use of 0x in names,
but I was not aware of a coding guideline for this.
The best two places I can think of are:
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt
and
http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage