Re: [PATCH 8/8] watchdog: Remove hack to make full dynticks working

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:33:31AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:31:06AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > A perf event can be used without forcing the tick to
> > stay alive if it doesn't use a frequency but a sample
> > period and if it doesn't throttle (raise storm of events).
> > 
> > Since the lockup detector neither use a perf event frequency
> > nor should ever throttle due to its high period, it can now
> > run concurrently with the full dynticks feature.
> 
> Thanks.  Dumb question, I keep wondering if the lockup detector would be
> better or worse off if it used the perf event frequency as opposed to
> using a sample period?  The idea is it could follow the varying cpu
> frequencies better (and probably simplify some of the code too).
> 
> Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

IIRC we tried that and I believe the issue was that perf did not
support frequency below 1. So probably the limitation was that it had to
fire at least once per sec.

Also if you do that, we fall into the full dynticks problem again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/