Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:

> Or perhaps, we could move *.dts around in the kernel to match the
> proposed DT tree structure before that point in time?
> 
> >> we will still need
> >> to copy dt-bindings into the kernel. Also, I think we should move all
> >> dts files out of arch subdirs and arrange by vendor or soc family. I'm
> >> sure there are some cases that structure doesn't fit well, but there is
> >> very little in a dts tied to a cpu architecture.
> > 
> > I couldn't agree more. So:
> > 
> > <root>/include/dt-bindings/vendor/*?
> 
> > <root>/dts/vendor/*?
> 
> I would tend to prefer that option, ...

Please make a generic top-level directory for DT and move the dtc code 
in there as well.  Something like:

<root>/devicetree/dtc/*
<root>/devicetree/dts/*


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/