Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested indevice tree janitoring / cleanup?]

[Jason Cooper]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > One problem that needs to be solved is obviously how a binding
> > graduates from tentative to locked. This work isn't going to be very
> > interesting to most people, I suspect. Think standards committee type
> > work.
> 
> I think a time based stabilization period would be better than a
> separate directory to apply bindings too. Or time plus periodic review
> perhaps.

The only problem with a time-based versus separate directory is how do
users who've downloaded the tree determine which bindings are stable?
If they pull a tarball, or receive an SDK, there is most likely no git
history attached.

I think the idea of a 'tentative' directory (or 'locked') is churnish,
but necessary.  If I DL'd a tarball and had to type 'tentative' to get
to the binding doc I wanted, that would be a pretty clear clue to be
delicate about how I trust/use/plan with that binding.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/