Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

[Dong Fang]

On 07/30/2013 01:01 AM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Dong,
>
> On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
>
> > On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
> > > list.
> > >
> > > It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
> > > for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
> > > patch was dropped.
> > >
> > > Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
> > > message every single time.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > dan carpenter
> > sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel,
> > but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me
>
> It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx only, as this
> is a specific patch for OCFS2.
>
> Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2".
>
> Thanks,
> -Jeff
thx, Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/