Re: [PATCH 02/18] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Wed Jul 31 2013 - 03:54:24 EST


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:50:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > index cc03cfd..c5f773d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -503,6 +503,17 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
> > #define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
> > #define raw_rq() (&__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues))
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + kfree(p->numa_faults);
> > +}
> > +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> > +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >
> > #define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \
>
>
> I also need the below hunk to make it compile:
>

Weird, I do not see the same problem so it's something .config specific.
Can you send me the .config you used please?

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/