Re: [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: oxygen: Updating jack implementation accordingnew ALSA Jacks

[Felipe Ferreri Tonello]

Hi Takashi,

On 07/29/2013 05:10 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:02:51 -0700,
> Felipe Tonello wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0700, Felipe F. Tonello wrote:
> > > > From: "Felipe F. Tonello" <eu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > ALSA standard jacks already are implemented using ALSA KControl.
> > > > So there is no need implement that itself or to use snd_jack
> > > > for input events only.
> > >
> > > Similar changlog comment as on the ASoC patch and...
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> > > >        snd_jack_new(chip->card, "Headphone",
> > > > -                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, &data->hp_jack);
> > > > +                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, 0, &data->hp_jack);
> > > >        xonar_ds_handle_hp_jack(chip);
> > >
> > > ...this really ought to be done as part of the commit that adds the
> > > parameter since it breaks the build until this patch is applied.
> >
> > But that's why is a patch series. But as you say, are you suggesting
> > me to propose this changes in one patch only?
>
> The basic rule of the patch series is:
> - they are split in a logical manner
> - each commit must not break the build
>
> The second rule is important especially for bisection and
> backporting.  You could have done in a different way (e.g. adding a
> new function like snd_jack_new_with_index() instead of changing
> snd_jack_new() itself).  Which way is better, depends on the
> implementation details.

In this case I think this will not solve the issue. Because the my 
propose is to make the control creation standard for jacks.

Felipe Tonello
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/