2013/8/1 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>:2013/8/1 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>:Hello,Well, I'd rather use "atmel" than "at91" because, AFAIK, this prefix
This patch series move at91 SoCs peripheral id definitions from machine
specific include dir to dt-bindings include dir.
These macros are used to reference interrupts instead of peripheral numbers.
This makes dt definitions cleaner and easier to debug (one can easily tell if
the peripheral macro used to reference an interrupt line is not the good one).
These macros will be used for clk definitions and references too.
I am not sure 'include/dt-bindings/at91/xxx' is the best place to put these
definitions as there are no soc specific directories in dt-bindings include
dir right now. Maybe something like 'include/dt-bindings/soc/at91/xxx' or
'include/dt-bindings/peripherals/at91/xxx' would be better.
What do you think ?
has been dropped for new atmel SoCs (sama5 for instance).
[changed Mark Brown address from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com to
kernel.org (the 1st one failed)]
The whole serie seems good to me (add adding the missing defines is great).
You can add my:
Reviewed-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>
on the whole serie.
and my
Tested-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>
on patch 7/8
Richard.