Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume_noirq callback toclear WAKEUP_INT

[Doug Anderson]

Fabio,

Thanks for your review.

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> +#else
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_suspend          NULL
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume           NULL
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq     NULL
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
>
> You could avoid this else block if you use 'static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS' below.
>
>> +
>>  static void dw_mci_exynos_prepare_command(struct dw_mci *host, u32 *cmdr)
>>  {
>>         /*
>> @@ -187,13 +234,20 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         return dw_mci_pltfm_register(pdev, drv_data);
>>  }
>>
>> +const struct dev_pm_ops dw_mci_exynos_pmops = {
>> +       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_suspend, dw_mci_exynos_resume)
>> +       .resume_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
>> +       .thaw_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
>> +       .restore_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
>> +};
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_pmops, dw_mci_exynos_suspend,
>  dw_mci_exynos_resume ) ;

The big problem is that SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() doesn't take a "_noirq"
parameters.  Do you know of one that does?

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/