Re: Question about REQ_FLUSH and bios with data

[scameron]

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:18:15PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 14:09 -0500, scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > So, I'm working on a block driver using the make_request_fn
> > interface, and have to handle a bio that comes in with
> > (bi_rw & REQ_FLUSH) set AND data to transfer. 
> > 
> > According to Documentation/block/writeback_cache_control.txt:
> > 
> > 	The REQ_FLUSH flag can be OR ed into the r/w flags of a
> > 	bio submitted from the filesystem and will make sure the
> > 	volatile cache of the storage device has been flushed
> > 	before the actual I/O operation is started. 
> > 
> > So I've written code that handles that case, along with the
> > various error cases I might encounter, I think, which leads
> > to my question:
> > 
> > How do I get such a bio with a data transfer AND the REQ_FLUSH bit
> > set to come into the driver?   Just wondering how to test this case.
> > 
> GFS2 does this... if you look at the log flush code and the function
> log_write_header() in particular, you'll see that it sets this on each
> log header that gets written. You don't need a cluster to generate this
> kind of i/o, just supply mkfs.gfs2 with -p lock_nolock and mount it as a
> local filesystem. The combination of touch foo; sync should be enough to
> generate a log flush writing a log header with this flag set,

Thanks!

Turns out ext3 seems to do it as well (now I feel kind of dumb
for asking -- had tried with ext2, and had tried some writes
with a file descriptor with O_SYNC set, but I was kind of shooting
in the dark.)

And my code appears to work too.

-- steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/