Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the ext4 tree
From: Kees Cook
Date: Fri Aug 09 2013 - 18:21:27 EST
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:19:03PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c between commit 49c6efc7b80e ("ext4: add new
> ioctl EXT4_IOC_PRECACHE_EXTENTS") from the ext4 tree and commit
> "fs-convert-fs-shrinkers-to-new-scan-count-api-fix" from the akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> index 28e2627,0361206..0000000
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> @@@ -947,13 -909,23 +947,15 @@@ static int __ext4_es_shrink(struct ext4
> struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
> struct list_head *cur, *tmp;
> LIST_HEAD(skiped);
> - int ret, nr_shrunk = 0;
> + unsigned long nr_shrunk = 0;
> + int retried = 0, skip_precached = 1, nr_skipped = 0;
>
> spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock);
>
> - /*
> - * If the inode that is at the head of LRU list is newer than
> - * last_sorted time, that means that we need to sort this list.
> - */
> - ei = list_first_entry(&sbi->s_es_lru, struct ext4_inode_info, i_es_lru);
> - if (sbi->s_es_last_sorted < ei->i_touch_when) {
> - list_sort(NULL, &sbi->s_es_lru, ext4_inode_touch_time_cmp);
> - sbi->s_es_last_sorted = jiffies;
> - }
> -
> +retry:
It seems like fs-convert-fs-shrinkers-to-new-scan-count-api-fix is carrying
this needless chunk above:
> list_for_each_safe(cur, tmp, &sbi->s_es_lru) {
> + int ret;
> +
> /*
> * If we have already reclaimed all extents from extent
> * status tree, just stop the loop immediately.
Which is masking the "ret" at the start, leading to warnings at build-time:
fs/ext4/extents_status.c: In function â__ext4_es_shrinkâ:
fs/ext4/extents_status.c:950:6: warning: unused variable âretâ [-Wunused-variable]
-Kees
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/