Re: Re-tune x86 uaccess code for PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 08/09/2013 04:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> This patch kit is an attempt to get us back to sane code, 
> mostly by doing proper inlining and doing sleep checks in the right
> place. Unfortunately I had to add one tree sweep to avoid an nasty
> include loop.
> 
> It costs a bit of text space, but I think it's worth it
> (if only to keep my blood pressure down while reading ftrace logs...)
> 

Looks nice at first glance.

Now, here is a bigger question: shouldn't we be deprecating/getting rid
of PREEMPT_VOUNTARY in favor of PREEMPT?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/