Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtkexecutable

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> To resolve this situation you could help us out by doing either of these:
 
>  1) integrate your tests into tools/, there's 'perf test' that has a ton
>     of testcases already

I think Jiri is working on merging some of those tests, Jiri?

Yeah, these at least:

commit 06933e3a732bb305b0721f1051a45264588e0519
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sun Mar 10 19:41:11 2013 +0100

    perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler counts

commit 5a6bef47b418676546ab86d25631c3cfb9ffaf2a
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sun Mar 10 19:41:10 2013 +0100

    perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler
 
>  2) run your testsuite more frequently - instead of waiting for a stable
>     kernel to be released and then complain about breakage.

My feeling is that he increased the frequency of such tests.

> So far you refused to do any of this and blamed others for non-reported 
> breakages :-/

He has been using the perf trinity fuzzer and reporting problems, thanks
Vince!

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/