Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: cleanups for 3.13

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 07:01:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael/Russell,
> 
> These patches would be part of this patchset finally, sending it separately as I
> didn't wanted to send other patches in that series..
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48
> 
> (Above series was rebased over https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263 and hence this
> patchset too)..
> 
> These first exposes frequency table and then uses cpufreq generic routines
> (which uses exposed table) instead of its own .verify() routine.
> 
> Later I will send another patch that would be part of this series:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/12/406
> 
> (I need to send that series again today and so not sending that patch twice,
> once here and then in that series)..
> 
> All these patches are pushed here with all dependencies:
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13

Are the three patches in this series prerequisite for the big target_index
one?  If so, I think they can go into 3.12 actually, if they are ACKed by the
appropriate platform maintainers.

> Viresh Kumar (3):
>   cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table
>   cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields
>   cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c   | 65 +++++++++++++---------------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.h   |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c |  9 +++---
>  drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c |  9 +++---
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/