Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add support for MSM TLMM pinmux

[Hanumant Singh]

On 8/15/2013 1:47 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Hanumant Singh <hanumant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Ok i can switch to using pin groups defined in per soc files.
> > But in our case we have one soc going into different types of boards.
> > (atleast 3). In each of the boards the same external devices end up using
> > different pins. For ex camera on board 1 uses different pin group
> > then the same camera on board 2. Both having the same SOC.
> > So in this case the design would be to have all possible pin groups
> > for different boards enumerated in the same soc-pinctrl.c file?
>
> Sorry I don't get this at all.
>
> What pin groups and functions that exist on a SoC is what you put into
> a SoC driver. Because this is a hardware characteristic.
>
> How these are combined on a board into different states is what you put
> into the device tree. (Or platform data.)

For example lets say for a given SOC A it goes into boards 1, 2, and 3.
Each of the boards has a display panel. The display panel uses two pins
1) a reset pin 2) an interrupt pin.

In the combination of SOC A + board 1
 - Display panel reset = pin no 5.
 - Display panel interrupt = pin no 9.

In combination of SOC A + board 2
 - Display panel reset = pin no 4.
 - Display panel interrupt = pin no 9.

In combination of SOC A + board 3
 - Display panel reset = pin no 7.
 - Display panel interrupt = pin no 2.

The pin groupings to be used by the display panel can be {5,9}, {4,9}, 
or {7,2}
These different pin groups and their function setting will be present in 
soc-pinctrl.c. The function setting is the same on all 3 cases.

The DT entry will correspond to the different states of these pins for 
the different boards.

Is this understanding correct?


> > Also in this implementation I will have.
> > 1) pinctrl-msm.c => DT parsing and interface to framework.
> > 2) pinctrl-msm-tlmm<version>.c => Register programming and pin types
> > supported by a particular TLMM pinmux version.
> > 3) pinctrl-<soc>.c => All the pins/pin groups supported by a given SOC.
>
> Seems OK.
>
> > As I
> > mentioned we will have a bloat of these, since we have entire families of
> > SOC using a given TLMM version but with unique pin groupings.
>
> Bring 'em on. But is that really different groups you are talking about,
> and not just combinations of groups with functions for a certain board
> as I describe above?
>
> If you have many SoC subdrivers, consider creating a subdir as some
> drivers already have.

Actually the SOC files, as I see it, will only contain the different pin 
groupings and the function setting for a given soc. The real driver 
implementation will be in 1) and 2) (the device being the TLMM pinmux 
version 3). I will currently refrain from creating a special msm 
directory. Maybe that can be a step 2) once we start adding more SOC's?
I will be starting the patch with msm8974 SOC only.

Thanks
Hanumant


--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/