Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix omitting to update inode page

[Gu Zheng]

On 08/26/2013 08:28 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:

> The f2fs_set_link updates its parent inode number, so we should sync this to
> the inode block.
> Otherwise, the data can be lost after sudden-power-off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/namei.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index 4e47518..9e90d31 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  		else
>  			release_orphan_inode(sbi);
>  
> +		update_inode_page(old_inode):

':' --> ';'

>  		update_inode_page(new_inode);
>  	} else {
>  		err = f2fs_add_link(new_dentry, old_inode);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/