Hello Boris,Okay, I will submit patches (based on net-next branch) to fix those bugs.
2013/8/27 boris brezillon <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>:Hello Dave,You will probably have to resubmit an incremental patch, I have never
On 26/08/2013 22:04, David Miller wrote:From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>Could you apply, the 3rd version of this series instead ?
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:20 +0200
This patch series adds support for ethernet phy definition using deviceSeries applied to net-next, thanks.
tree.
This may help in moving some at91 boards to dt (some of them define an
interrupt pin).
Tested on samad31ek.
It fixes one bug when no phy is discovered and use the appropriate address
for the phy dt node.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
seen David pick up another version of a patch once it has been pushed
out:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=8c038e7e14b1c5f156745e3c4df0a3aa46173dd9
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=148cbb53ace32f584d208764c7f7e6aa8edb970c