Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

[Viresh Kumar]

On 28 August 2013 03:31, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index b9b20fd..523af48 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                 return;
>
>         if (!all_cpus) {
> -               __gov_queue_work(smp_processor_id(), dbs_data, delay);
> +               __gov_queue_work(policy->cpu, dbs_data, delay);

This is probably wrong.. We wanted to queue work on current cpu and
not policy->cpu.. Can you use raw_smp_processor_id()?

>         } else {
>                 for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
>                         __gov_queue_work(i, dbs_data, delay);
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/