Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: coupled: disable interrupts after entering safe state

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 03:00:58 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Friday, August 23, 2013 12:45:10 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> >> Calling cpuidle_enter_state is expected to return with interrupts
> >> enabled, but interrupts must be disabled before starting the
> >> ready loop synchronization stage.  Call local_irq_disable after
> >> each call to cpuidle_enter_state for the safe state.
> >>
> >> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I've queued up all thress for 3.12, but I wonder what stable versions they
> > should be included into?  All of them or just a subset?
> 
> The patches apply cleanly back to v3.6.
> 
> Joseph Lo had 2 minor comments on patch 2 (changing Tegra3 to Tegra20
> in the commit message, replacing cpuidle_coupled_poke_pending with
> cpuidle_coupled_poked in the comment above cpuidle_coupled_poked), do
> you want to fix those up locally or should I resend the series?

I'd prefer it to be resent, then, but just the patch(es) that changed.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/