Re: [PATCH trivial] block/ioctl.c: let code match 'kernel code style'

[Chen Gang]

On 09/03/2013 04:55 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> Please don't. Pure colding style cleanup is discouraged.
> 

Pardon?

Do you mean "coding style", not "colding style"? (or it is my
misunderstanding?).


> You're not going to run checkpatch.pl on the whole kernel tree and fix
> all the complaints, are you?
> 

I am not going to, it seems that may be the 'job' of Joe and
trivial@xxxxxxxxxx?


BTW: it seems you did not redirect my mails to "/dev/null".  ;-)

Thanks.

> On 2013/9/3 16:29, Chen Gang wrote:
>> For 'switch case', remove redundancy '\t' (also can let related lines
>> within 80 columns) and remove redundancy empty lines, just like other
>> 'switch case' which match 'kernel code style' within the file.
>>
>> Let blkpg_ioctl() within 80 columns. Let 2nd line of blkdev_ioctl() and
>> __blkdev_driver_ioctl() align 1st line parameter's start position, just
>> like blk_ioctl_discard() and blk_ioctl_zeroout() within the file.
>>
>> For is_unrecognized_ioctl(), can shrink the 'return' statement into one
>> line (so can save 2 lines), it still matches 'kernel code style' and it
>> is no conflict with others within the file.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  block/ioctl.c |  216 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>  1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/