Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 3.12

From: Gleb Natapov
Date: Wed Sep 04 2013 - 06:39:13 EST


Copying Marek, Aneesh and Alex since this came through PPC kvm tree.

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:10:46PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> [...]
> > Aneesh Kumar K.V (5):
> > mm/cma: Move dma contiguous changes into a seperate config
>
> Hi Gleb,
>
> This commit is going to cause runtime regressions on various ARM
> platforms because it renames a symbol but fails to update all default
> configurations that select the symbol. A quick grep shows that three ARM
> platforms are affected:
>
> $ git grep CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
>
> I've been digging around a bit and it seems like the original patch from
> Aneesh had the defconfig changes but they were dropped because they "...
> require separate handling to avoid pointless merge conflicts."[0]
>
Marek, that's your words. What do you think about ARM problem?

> While I can't speak for Keystone or OMAP, at least on Tegra this causes
> issues because we use CMA for framebuffer allocation. Since we only have
> CMA selected but not the new DMA_CMA, large DMA allocations will fail.
>
Make config suppose to ask you about new option though, does it?

> Can we have the defconfig changes added back to this patch, please? I
> suspect that Linus can handle any resulting merge conflicts.
>
> Thierry
>
> [0]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/102707



--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/