Re: [PATCH] perf kvm: fix sample_type manipulation

[David Ahern]

On 9/6/13 6:53 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:48:54AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > Manipulating the sample_type of an evsel requires
> > the use of:
> > 	perf_evsel__set_sample_bit()
> > and	perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit()
>
> Fine, but...

hmmm... this is a relatively new API (7be5ebe8). The kvm-live command 
and my scheduling daemon pre-date its introduction.

> > Manipulating the sample type of an evlist requires
> > the id position to be recalculated.

And this is hot of the presses ... 75562573.

> ... can't we hide this detail? I.e. we could do it like we do with the
> alloc_{mmap,poll}() evlist methods in perf_evlist__mmap(), checking if it was
> already done, etc.
>
> This we reduce the contact surface for tools using evlists and evsels.
>
> I.e., this sequence:
>
>
> +	perf_evlist__set_id_pos(evlist);
> +
>   	err = perf_evlist__open(evlist);
>
> Could remain just:
>
> 	err = perf_evlist__open(evlist);

perf code has been around a while now and I know there are a number of 
local analysis commands built around it. API changes like this -- 
required ones at that -- need to be simple and some error checking built 
in where possible.

... and documentation for the API on what commands should be doing and 
in what order.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/