[004/121] sched: Fix the broken sched_rr_get_interval()
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sat Sep 07 2013 - 23:23:27 EST
3.2.51-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba upstream.
The caller of sched_sliced() should pass se.cfs_rq and se as the
arguments, however in sched_rr_get_interval() we gave it
rq.cfs_rq and se, which made the following computation obviously
wrong.
The change was introduced by commit:
77034937dc45 sched: fix crash in sys_sched_rr_get_interval()
... 5 years ago, while it had been the correct 'cfs_rq_of' before
the commit. The change seems to be irrelevant to the commit
msg, which was to return a 0 timeslice for tasks that are on an
idle runqueue. So I believe that was just a plain typo.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1357621012-15039-1-git-send-email-gaoyang.zyh@xxxxxxxxxx
[ Since this is an ABI and an old bug, we'll test this via a
slow upstream route, to hopefully discover any app breakage. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -5033,7 +5033,7 @@ static unsigned int get_rr_interval_fair
* idle runqueue:
*/
if (rq->cfs.load.weight)
- rr_interval = NS_TO_JIFFIES(sched_slice(&rq->cfs, se));
+ rr_interval = NS_TO_JIFFIES(sched_slice(cfs_rq_of(se), se));
return rr_interval;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/