Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side criticalsection?

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:13:02 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:34:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:59:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:40:26 -0400
> > > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Agreed. So how about rcu_is_online() ?
> > > 
> > > Nope, what about all_your_base_are_belong_to_rcu()?
> > 
> > Let's see if I can remember the candidates...
> > 
> > 	rcu_is_cpu_idle() # reversed sense from the others
> > 	rcu_is_ignored() # reversed sense from the others
> > 	rcu_is_not_active() # reversed sense from the others
> > 	rcu_is_watching_cpu()
> > 	rcu_read_check()
> > 	rcu_is_active()
> > 	rcu_is_active_local()
> > 	rcu_is_online()
> > 	rcu_is_watching_task()
> > 	rcu_is_watching_thread()
> > 	rcu_is_watching_you()
> > 	all_your_base_are_belong_to_rcu()
> > 	rcu_is_active_loco()
> > 	rcu_kilroy_was_here()
> > 
> > Maybe I should just lock them all in a room overnight and see which
> > are still alive in the morning.
> 
> And after treating injuries, the survivor is rcu_is_watching().
> 

But, but, but...

That wasn't one of the contenders!

What happened? Did rcu_is_watching_cpu(), rcu_is_watching_task(),
rcu_is_watching_thread() and rcu_is_watching_you() all get together to
gang up on the others, and then combined to be one?

It's another Iraq! Several segments joined together by an outside
force and they don't play well together. And like Iraq (and the US),
hidden inside of this "community" is "rcu_is_watching_you"!

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/