On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 17:36 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:Scott, you're right, I didn't see that other consequence.I wonder why we don't start from entry 31 so we can actually make use ofSince they don't affect anything outside of 8xx, I'm happy to take them
that autodecrement. What will happen when we load the first normal TLB
entry later on? I don't see any setting of SPRN_MD_CTR after this code,
so won't it overwrite entry 30 (the middle 8M) in the CONFIG_PIN_TLB
case?
Ben, would patches like this be considered bugfixes as far as merging
goes, or would they be for next given that it's something that's never
really worked right and hasn't been touched in years?
until around -rc2 or 3. But it's your call really.