Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices
From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Thu Sep 12 2013 - 05:37:59 EST
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case
> > > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for
> > > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into
> > > the SPI tree that'd be good.
>
> > I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have
> > dependencies to the I2C tree.
>
> There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole
> series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems.
Ah, right. Then I suppose the right tree would be the I2C tree (as majority
of the patches are I2C related)?
Wolfram, are you OK with this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/