Re: [PATCH] ll_temac: Reset dma descriptors on ndo_open

[Ricardo Ribalda Delgado]

Hello David

lp->tx_bd_ci, lp->tx_bd_next...  are only initialized to zero on
temac_of_probe (inside  alloc_etherdev).  Those vars are used to index
the dma descriptors.

The initialization of  lp->tx_bd_v[i].app0 = 0; is redundant, because
it is already done on dma_zalloc_coherent in temac_dma_bd_init called
on open.

What if I move
       lp->tx_bd_ci = 0;
       lp->tx_bd_next = 0;
       lp->tx_bd_tail = 0;
       lp->rx_bd_ci = 0;

to temac_dma_bd_init? Will this be more correct?

Without this patch a script like these kills the card in 1-10 iterations:


ifdown eth0
ifdown eth1
while true

do
ifconfig eth1 10.100.10.100
udhcpc -i eth0
ping 192.168.2.1 -c 5 || break
ifconfig eth0 down


ifconfig eth0 10.100.10.100
udhcpc -i eth1
ping 192.168.2.1 -c 5 || break
ifconfig eth1 down

done


Regards

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:21 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:24:28 +0200
>
>> The dma descriptors are only initialized on the probe function.
>>
>> If a packet is on the buffer when temac_stop is called, the dma
>> descriptors can be left on a incorrect status where no other package can
>> be sent.
>>
>> So an interface could be left in an usable state after ifdow/ifup.
>>
>> This patch makes sure that the descriptors are in a proper status when
>> the device is started.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This analysis is not correct.
>
> In the current driver, the descriptors are allocated and initialized
> in the open function, not the probe function.
>
> I'm not applying this patch.



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/