Re: [BUG] perf timechart segfault

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > looks like you're missing this one:
> > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux perf/core)
> 
> Very messy; doesn't rebase on top of the latest torvalds/linux.git 
> cleanly: I get a merge conflict at patch 9 of 74. Since my work is based 
> on torvalds/linux.git, I was hoping to rebase it on top of Arnaldo's 
> tree, but that results in conflicts too: I'm resolving them now.
> 
> Are the merge windows always this large? Why isn't Arnaldo's tree listed 
> in MAINTAINERS?

note that it's Arnaldo's development tree, not a tree to generally base 
pull requests on - that is what tip:perf/core is for.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/