Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}()as void

[Viresh Kumar]

On 2 October 2013 22:08, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 02:13:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 30 September 2013 23:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Monday, September 16, 2013 08:40:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() currently has return type of int but it always
>> >> return zero and hence its return type must be void instead. This patch makes its
>> >> return type void and fixes all users of it as well.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: Jon Medhurst<tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > This doesn't apply to bleeding-edge for me any more after I have applied your
>> > series of 44 patches to it.  Care to resend?
>>
>> Done..
>
> Which one is it?
>

 [PATCH RESEND 01/11] cpufreq: make return type of
lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/