Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/memmmap

[Frantisek Hrbata]

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:46:35AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 09:05 AM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > +
> > +int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
> > +{
> > +	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t count)
> > +{
> > +	resource_size_t addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + count;
> > +	return phys_addr_valid(addr);
> > +}
> > 
> 
> The latter has overflow problems.

Could you please specify what overflow problems do you mean?

> 
> The former I realize matches the current /dev/mem, but it is still just
> plain wrong in multiple ways.

I guess that you are talking about /dev/mem implementation generelly, because
this patch is exactly the same as the first one. All I'm trying to do here is to
fix this simple problem, which was reported by a customer, using IMHO the least
invasive way. Anyway is there any description what is wrong with /dev/mem
implementation? Maybe I can try to take a look.

Many thanks

> 
> 	-hpa
> 

-- 
Frantisek Hrbata
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/