Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add shared update_fdt() function for ARM/ARM64
From: Matt Fleming
Date: Thu Oct 03 2013 - 05:52:35 EST
On Sat, 28 Sep, at 09:23:19AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> Both ARM and ARM64 stubs will update the device tree
> that they pass to the kernel. In both cases they
> primarily need to add the same UEFI related information,
> so the function can be shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c
> index cc0581d..d3448a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> * implementation files.
> *
> * Copyright 2011 Intel Corporation; author Matt Fleming
> + * Copyright 2013 Linaro Limited; author Roy Franz
> *
> * This file is part of the Linux kernel, and is made available
> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
> @@ -636,3 +637,88 @@ static char *efi_convert_cmdline_to_ascii(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
> *cmd_line_len = options_size;
> return (char *)cmdline_addr;
> }
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +static efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
> + void *fdt, int new_fdt_size, char *cmdline_ptr,
> + u64 initrd_addr, u64 initrd_size,
> + efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map,
> + unsigned long map_size, unsigned long desc_size,
> + u32 desc_ver)
Hmm... does this function really belong in efi-stub-helper.c? That file
should be for architecture independent functionality only.
While it currently does include this little snippet,
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
/*
* For ARM, allocate at a high address to avoid reserved
* regions at low addresses that we don't know the specfics of
* at the time we are processing the command line.
*/
status = efi_high_alloc(sys_table_arg, options_size, 0,
&cmdline_addr, 0xfffff000);
#else
status = efi_low_alloc(sys_table_arg, options_size, 0,
&cmdline_addr);
#endif
I think that single #ifdef is justifiable. But including entire
functions that are only used by ARM/ARM64 or x86 isn't.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/