Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal: exynos: Provide separate TMU data for Exynos4412

[Eduardo Valentin]

Lukasz,

Just minor comments.

On 24-09-2013 04:08, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Up till now Exynos5250 and Exynos4412 had the same definitions for TMU
> data. Following commit changes that, by introducing separate
> exynos4412_default_tmu_data structure.
> 
> Since Exynos4412 was chronologically first, the corresponding name for
> TMU registers and default data was renamed.
> 
> Additionally, new SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412 type has been defined.

It is not clear the objective of the patch itself. Was it just to make
the code more readable or are you fixing something?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c      |    7 ++++---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h      |    1 +
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h |    9 ++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index b43afda..a858cc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_tmu_match[] = {
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-tmu",
> -		.data = (void *)EXYNOS5250_TMU_DRV_DATA,
> +		.data = (void *)EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA,
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-tmu",
> @@ -630,8 +630,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	if (pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS ||
> -		pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 ||
> -				pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440)
> +	    pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 ||
> +	    pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412 ||
> +	    pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440)
>  		data->soc = pdata->type;
>  	else {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> index b364c9e..db37df0 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum calibration_mode {
>  
>  enum soc_type {
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 = 1,
> +	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
>  	SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440,
>  };

I believe the above enum needs some documentation. SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS seams
to be a bit confusing.

> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> index 9002499..bd08093 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos4210_default_tmu_data = {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)
> -static const struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
> +static const struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos4412_tmu_registers = {
>  	.triminfo_data = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO,
>  	.triminfo_25_shift = EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_25_SHIFT,
>  	.triminfo_85_shift = EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT,
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static const struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = {
>  	.emul_time_mask = EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME_MASK,
>  };
>  
> -#define EXYNOS5250_TMU_DATA \
> +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA \
>  	.threshold_falling = 10, \
>  	.trigger_levels[0] = 85, \
>  	.trigger_levels[1] = 103, \
> @@ -162,15 +162,29 @@ static const struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = {
>  		.temp_level = 103, \
>  	}, \
>  	.freq_tab_count = 2, \
> -	.type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS, \
> -	.registers = &exynos5250_tmu_registers, \
> +	.registers = &exynos4412_tmu_registers, \
>  	.features = (TMU_SUPPORT_EMULATION | TMU_SUPPORT_TRIM_RELOAD | \
>  			TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP | TMU_SUPPORT_READY_STATUS | \
>  			TMU_SUPPORT_EMUL_TIME)
> +#endif
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)
> +struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos4412_default_tmu_data = {
> +	.tmu_data = {
> +		{ EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
> +		.type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412,
> +		},
> +	},
> +	.tmu_count = 1,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
>  struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos5250_default_tmu_data = {
>  	.tmu_data = {
> -		{ EXYNOS5250_TMU_DATA },
> +		{ EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
> +		.type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
> +		},

Please add a comment on this initialization, specially because we start
to mix macros with inline initialization. Starts to be hard to follow.

Besides, I believe
+		{
+			EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
+			.type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
+		},

is a much more common style.


>  	},
>  	.tmu_count = 1,
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> index dc7feb5..b130b1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> @@ -138,7 +138,14 @@ extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos4210_default_tmu_data;
>  #define EXYNOS4210_TMU_DRV_DATA (NULL)
>  #endif
>  
> -#if (defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412))
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)
> +extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos4412_default_tmu_data;
> +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA (&exynos4412_default_tmu_data)
> +#else
> +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA (NULL)
> +#endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
>  extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos5250_default_tmu_data;
>  #define EXYNOS5250_TMU_DRV_DATA (&exynos5250_default_tmu_data)
>  #else
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature