Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
> > > master branch of the repository below:
> > >
> > >           git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
> > >
> > > A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300
> > > architecture which I didn't report for triviality.  Several new build
> > > failures were found as a result of running allmodconfig tests between
> > > merges all of which have been reported and I'm still carrying the i.MX
> > > fix that Thierry has been carrying.
> > >
> > > Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
> > > the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his
> > > autobuilder.  I'm going to use allyesconfig tomorrow since that should
> > > run faster so hopefully I can cover the ARM, i386 and x86_64 configs
> > > again.
> >
> > I could try to set up the buildbot farm I am using for -stable candidates
> > to also test the -next tree. Would that help ?
>
> ARM is pretty well-covered by my builds, I post results at:
>
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports

Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/