Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Clean up cap_user_time* setting

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:31:22PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 4/10/2013 8:31 p.m., tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >Commit-ID:  d8b11a0cbd1c66ce283eb9dabe0498dfa6483f32
> >Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d8b11a0cbd1c66ce283eb9dabe0498dfa6483f32
> >Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >AuthorDate: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:00:14 +0200
> >Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >CommitDate: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:58:55 +0200
> >
> >perf/x86: Clean up cap_user_time* setting
> >
> >Currently the cap_user_time_zero capability has different tests than
> >cap_user_time; even though they expose the exact same data.
> >
> >Switch from CONSTANT && NONSTOP to sched_clock_stable to also deal
> >with multi cabinet machines and drop the tsc_disabled() check.. non of
> >this will work sanely without tsc anyway.
> 
> Unfortunately in the case that TSC is disabled, sched_clock is still
> reported as stable, which means removing the tsc_disabled() check breaks
> the capability bit. e.g.

I'm wanting to hear from the x86 people on why we have this absurd knob
to begin with; but I'm tempted to simply disable all of perf if you
touch it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/