Re: [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq fixes and improvements

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Fri Oct 04 2013 - 17:20:26 EST

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] LSM: MntRestrict blocks mounts on symlink targets"
Previous message: Al Viro: "Re: security: lockless stat() issues"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH 5/5] [PATCH 5/5] block: use blk-exec.c infrastructure for blk-mq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/04/2013 07:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The first two patches make blk-mq work fine again for me in a KVM VM,
> the others make sure that consumers don't have to care if the underlying queue
> uses blk-mq or not and remove some code at the same time.

Thanks Christoph, applied.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] LSM: MntRestrict blocks mounts on symlink targets"
Previous message: Al Viro: "Re: security: lockless stat() issues"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH 5/5] [PATCH 5/5] block: use blk-exec.c infrastructure for blk-mq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]