Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 10/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:06:53PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > However, yes-yes-yes, I do think that we need the non-exclusive mode
> > too, at least for percpu_down_write_nonexclusive() which I think we
> > need as well.
>
> I just need to disagree with the write_nonexclusive() name; the
> construct I quite understand and could even agree with.
>
> How about something like:

I am fine either way ;)

> At which point I start to have doubts about the percpu prefix.. ;-)

Yes... and "percpu" just refers to implementation details, this is
pointless.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/