Re: [RFC] Input: introduce ABS_MAX2/CNT2 and friends

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:32:23AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:10:36AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > As we painfully noticed during the 3.12 merge-window our
> > EVIOCGABS/EVIOCSABS API is limited to ABS_MAX<=0x3f. We tried several
> > hacks to work around it but if we ever decide to increase ABS_MAX, the
> > EVIOCSABS ioctl ABI might overflow into the next byte causing horrible
> > misinterpretations in the kernel that we cannot catch.
> > 
> > Therefore, we decided to go with ABS_MAX2/CNT2 and introduce two new
> > ioctls to get/set abs-params. They no longer encode the ABS code in the
> > ioctl number and thus allow up to 4 billion ABS codes.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the uinput API also hard-coded the ABS_CNT value in its
> > ABI. To avoid any hacks in uinput, we simply introduce a new
> > uinput_user_dev2 to replace the old one. The new API allows growing
> > ABS_CNT2 values without any API changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hi
> > 
> > This is only compile-tested but I wanted to get a first revision out to let
> > people know what we're working on. Unfortunately, the ABS API has this horribly
> > low ABS_MAX limit and we couldn't figure out a way to increase it while keeping
> > ABI compatibility.
> > 
> > Any feedback and review is welcome. And if anyone spots ABI breakage by this
> > patch, please let me know. If nothing comes up I will patch libevdev to use the
> > new API, write some extensive test-cases and push this forward.
> > 
> > As a sidenote: I didn't modify joydev to use the new values. Fortunately, the
> > joydev API would allow switching to ABS_CNT2 without breaking API, but it would
> > limit the new ABS_CNT2 to 16k. This is quite high but nothing compared to the
> >  2^32 that we can theoretically support now. If you think 16k ought to be enough
> > (probably?) I can adjust the joydev API, too.
> > All other kernel users were converted to the new values. Nothing left behind..
> 
> 
> just a comment from skimming the patch:
> if you need a new uinput abi anyway, can we add the resolution here? it's
> sorely needed for some tests. see also the patch Benjamin sent a while ago
> ("input/uinput: support abs resolution", July 15 2013)

Indeed. Also, while we are at it, would it make sense to allow
requesting a range of ABS infos at once?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/