Re: [PATCH 62/63] sched: numa: use unsigned longs for numa groupfault stats

[Rik van Riel]

On 10/07/2013 06:29 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> As Peter says "If you're going to hold locks you can also do away with all
> that atomic_long_*() nonsense". Lock aquisition moved slightly to protect
> the updates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/