Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interruptsnext to the request function

[Alexandre Courbot]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
>>> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
>>>> functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
>>> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
>>> 100% right.
>>
>> I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
>> version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
>> that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
>> series?
>
> The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think?
> So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into
> linux-next as that comes back online.
>
> So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on
> yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here...

Yes it is. I have sent you the v2 of my series last Friday (+ one fix
to squash into 3/3).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/