Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: add percpu fixup for GNU ld 2.23

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 10/15/2013 11:43 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> The GNU linker tries to put __per_cpu_load into the percpu area, resulting
> in a lack of its relocation. Force this symbol to be relocated. Seen
> starting with GNU ld 2.23 and later.
> 
> Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/tools/relocs.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> index 1fa291f..7a85f29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static void percpu_init(void)
>   *
>   * The GNU linker incorrectly associates:
>   *	__init_begin
> + *	__per_cpu_load
>   *
>   * The "gold" linker incorrectly associates:
>   *	init_per_cpu__irq_stack_union
> @@ -738,6 +739,7 @@ static int is_percpu_sym(ElfW(Sym) *sym, const char *symname)
>  {
>  	return (sym->st_shndx == per_cpu_shndx) &&
>  		strcmp(symname, "__init_begin") &&
> +		strcmp(symname, "__per_cpu_load") &&
>  		strncmp(symname, "init_per_cpu_", 13);
>  }
>  
> 

Why isn't this list using a regex like other symbol classes?

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/