Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver

[Chen Gong]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:35PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:24:35 +0530
> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>  linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, m.chehab@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> 
> On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
> > Use trace interface to elaborate all H/W error related
> > information.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> <snip>
> > +TRACE_EVENT(extlog_mem_event,
> > +	TP_PROTO(u32 etype,
> > +		char *dimm_loc,
> > +		const uuid_le *fru_id,
> > +		char *fru_text,
> > +		u64 error_count,
> > +		u32 severity,
> > +		u64 phy_addr,
> > +		char *mem_loc),
> 
> [Adding Mauro...]
> 
> This looks very similar to the trace event I wrote a while back,
> which was similar to the one provided by ghes_edac:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/24616
> 
> Seems to me this has the same issues we previously discussed w.r.t
> EDAC conflicts...
> 
This thread is so long. I have to say I'm lost ...
Anyway, it looks like there are many different opnions on this last
patch. I will send the 2nd version for further discussion soon.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature