Re: fs/attr.c:notify_change locking warning.

[Dave Chinner]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:05:28AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:36:18AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Sure, but file_remove_suid() doesn't actually modify any VFS inode
> > structures until we process the flags and the modifications within
> > ->setattr, which in XFS are all done under the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL via
> > xfs_setattr_mode(). i.e. both the VFS and XFS inodes S*ID bits are
> > removed only under XFS_ILOCK_EXCL....
> 
> It can set S_NOSEC after calling into ->setattr at least.
> 
> > Hence I see no point in adding extra serialisation via the i_mutex
> > to this path when we can just do something like:
> > 
> > 	killsuid = should_remove_suid(file->f_path.dentry);
> > 	if (killsuid) {
> > 		struct iattr	newattr;
> > 
> > 		newattr.ia_valid = ATTR_FORCE | killsuid;
> > 		error = xfs_setattr_nonsize(ip, &newattr, 0);
> > 		if (error)
> > 			return error;
> > 	}
> 
> We'd still need all the other magic in file_remove_suid, which I don't
> actually quite undersdtand fully yet.

The killpriv calls? I couldn't find anything that implemented those
security hooks nor any documentation about it, so I'm pretty much
clueless about it. FWIW, ocfs2 doesn't implement them, either....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/