Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: move encode_insn_immediate() from module.cto insn.c

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:18:08AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Function encode_insn_immediate() will be used by other instruction
> manipulate related functions, so move it into insn.c and rename it
> as aarch64_insn_encode_immediate().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h |  14 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c      |  77 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/module.c    | 151 +++++++++---------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> index 2dfcdb4..8dc0a91 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,18 @@ enum aarch64_insn_class {
>                                          * system instructions */
>  };
> 
> +enum aarch64_insn_imm_type {
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MOVNZ,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MOVK,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_16,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_12,
> +       AARCH64_INSN_IMM_9,
> +};
> +
>  #define        __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(abbr, mask, val)   \
>  static __always_inline bool aarch64_insn_is_##abbr(u32 code) \
>  { return (code & (mask)) == (val); }   \
> @@ -47,6 +59,8 @@ __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(nop,     0xFFFFFFFF, 0xD503201F)
>  #undef __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS
> 
>  enum aarch64_insn_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
> +u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
> +                                 u32 insn, u64 imm);
>  u32 aarch64_insn_read(void *addr);
>  void aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn);
>  bool aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> index ad4185f..90cc312 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> @@ -179,3 +179,80 @@ int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt)
>         else
>                 return aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(addrs, insns, cnt);
>  }
> +
> +u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
> +                                 u32 insn, u64 imm)
> +{
> +       u32 immlo, immhi, lomask, himask, mask;
> +       int shift;
> +
> +       switch (type) {
> +       case AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MOVNZ:
> +               /*
> +                * For signed MOVW relocations, we have to manipulate the
> +                * instruction encoding depending on whether or not the
> +                * immediate is less than zero.
> +                */
> +               insn &= ~(3 << 29);
> +               if ((s64)imm >= 0) {
> +                       /* >=0: Set the instruction to MOVZ (opcode 10b). */
> +                       insn |= 2 << 29;
> +               } else {
> +                       /*
> +                        * <0: Set the instruction to MOVN (opcode 00b).
> +                        *     Since we've masked the opcode already, we
> +                        *     don't need to do anything other than
> +                        *     inverting the new immediate field.
> +                        */
> +                       imm = ~imm;
> +               }

I'm really not comfortable with this. This code is performing static
relocations and re-encoding instructions as required by the AArch64 ELF
spec. That's not really what you'd expect from a generic instruction
encoder!

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/