Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: cppi41: redo descriptor collection in abortcase

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 10/17/2013 04:23 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
> 
> Will do (hopefully) tomorrow. So this is a replacement for my "dma:
> cppi41: move -EAGAIN in tear_down" patch, or does it go on top of it?

I applied your three patches and manage to break 2 of 4 tests I had. It
was still the same without your patch. So I made this change and merged
it back into your patch so this patch should apply ontop of your 2/3.

> How does your patch queue look like? Someone should probably re-collect
> all necessary patches for the next merge window eventually, so Vinod
> knows what to apply :)

dma: cppi41: add support for suspend and resume
dma: cppi41: restore more registers
dma: cppi41: use cppi41_pop_desc() where possible
dma: cppi41: redo descriptor collection in abort case
dma: cppi41: return code > 0 of pm_runtime_get_sync() is not an error

The first one is in Vinod's tree.

> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/