Re: sparse: possible false report of context imbalance

From: Larry Finger
Date: Thu Oct 17 2013 - 13:41:09 EST


On 10/17/2013 11:25 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:23:56PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Sparse reports the following:

CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:1003:9: warning: context
imbalance in 'rtw_free_assoc_resources' - different lock contexts
for basic block

The code in question is as follows:

if (lock_scanned_queue)
spin_lock_bh(&(pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock));

pwlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue,
tgt_network->network.MacAddress);

if (lock_scanned_queue)
spin_unlock_bh(&(pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock));

As this fragment uses the identical test to unlock that is used to
lock, and the test variable is not touched, I think this is a false
indication. I am using version 0.4.4 of sparse.

Sparse can't track conditional contexts like this; sparse intentionally
complains here that you're running the same basic block (the
rtw_find_network call) with and without a lock held.

The following workaround works when this is legitimate, though it isn't
ideal:

if (condition) {
lock
do_thing
unlock
} else {
do_thing
}

Ideally, Sparse should be able to track conditional contexts, but that
would require some form of abstract evaluation, or as a simplistic hack,
looking for identical side-effect-free conditional expressions.

Thanks for the answer, which is about what I expected. Sparse is a great tool, particularly for endian-related issues.

Larry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/