On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:23:56PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:Sparse reports the following:
CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:1003:9: warning: context
imbalance in 'rtw_free_assoc_resources' - different lock contexts
for basic block
The code in question is as follows:
if (lock_scanned_queue)
spin_lock_bh(&(pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock));
pwlan = rtw_find_network(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue,
tgt_network->network.MacAddress);
if (lock_scanned_queue)
spin_unlock_bh(&(pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock));
As this fragment uses the identical test to unlock that is used to
lock, and the test variable is not touched, I think this is a false
indication. I am using version 0.4.4 of sparse.
Sparse can't track conditional contexts like this; sparse intentionally
complains here that you're running the same basic block (the
rtw_find_network call) with and without a lock held.
The following workaround works when this is legitimate, though it isn't
ideal:
if (condition) {
lock
do_thing
unlock
} else {
do_thing
}
Ideally, Sparse should be able to track conditional contexts, but that
would require some form of abstract evaluation, or as a simplistic hack,
looking for identical side-effect-free conditional expressions.