Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree
From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Thu Oct 17 2013 - 17:50:53 EST
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:23:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got conflicts in
> mm/mprotect.c between c3d16e1652 (mm: migration: do not lose soft dirty
> bit if page is in migration state) from Linus' tree and e920e14c (mm: Do
> not flush TLB during protection change if !pte_present &&
> !migration_entry) from the tip tree.
>
> I've fixed up as below and can carry as required.
>
Thanks a lot, dirty bit handling looks good!
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/