Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] clk: tegra: move fields to tegra_clk_pll_params

[Andrew Bresticker]

Hi Peter,

> @@ -1682,17 +1664,15 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllc(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
>  struct clk *tegra_clk_register_plle_tegra114(const char *name,
>                                 const char *parent_name,
>                                 void __iomem *clk_base, unsigned long flags,
> -                               unsigned long fixed_rate,
>                                 struct tegra_clk_pll_params *pll_params,
> -                               struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table *freq_table,
>                                 spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
>         struct tegra_clk_pll *pll;
>         struct clk *clk;
>         u32 val, val_aux;
>
> -       pll = _tegra_init_pll(clk_base, NULL, fixed_rate, pll_params,
> -                             TEGRA_PLL_HAS_LOCK_ENABLE, freq_table, lock);
> +       pll_params->flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_LOCK_ENABLE;

Why are we just overwriting the flags?  We pass in flags here:

> @@ -661,6 +685,9 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_e_params = {
>         .lock_enable_bit_idx = PLLE_MISC_LOCK_ENABLE,
>         .lock_delay = 300,
>         .div_nmp = &plle_nmp,
> +       .freq_table = pll_e_freq_table,
> +       .flags = TEGRA_PLL_FIXED,

TEGRA_PLL_FIXED doesn't actually make a difference in the
plle_tegra114 case, but it would be nice to be correct about setting
it.

Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/