Re: [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: single: Add support for wake-up interrupts

[Balaji T K]

On Friday 11 October 2013 09:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> [131011 09:05]:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> [131011 03:40]:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The register handling is fine. But how do we deal with resource handling?
> > > > > e.g. the block that has the deep-core registers might need to be clocked or powered
> > > > > before the registers can be accessed.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah I saw this in the code there.
> > > >
> > > > In this case it seems syscon-type regmap access can be used to
> > > > read/write the registers, so maybe the pin controller also need to
> > > >   get a handle on some clock etc?
> > >
> > > Uhh, let's not go there.. The resource availability needs to be
> > > handled transparently in regmap code and the reg provider hardware
> > > module driver using runtime PM.
> >
> > OK we can surely discuss this with broonie, it makes sense to
> > have regmap be able to do its deed transparently.
>
> Yes I think so too. Sounds like we need callbacks for the runtime PM
> checks to the "register provider" driver. Hwo knows, maybe those
> features are there already :)

Hi Tony,

Any conclusion on using regmap for omap control module non-mux registers ?

Thanks and Regards,
Balaji T K
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/