Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI, x86: Extended error log driver for x86platform

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:07:56PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >@@ -624,6 +641,9 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
> >  		    (m.status & (mca_cfg.ser ? MCI_STATUS_S : MCI_STATUS_UC)))
> >  			continue;
> >
> >+		if (mce_ext_err_print)
> >+			mce_ext_err_print(NULL, m.extcpu, i);
> >+
> 
> Can we use the notifier chain we already have:
> mce_register_decode_chain()? EDAC uses this and I'm wondering if it
> is a good fit here. As an added bonus, it seems to honor dont_log_ce
> option as well.

Hmm, that's a good question you raise: but the more important question
is, do you guys - Gong and Tony - want to replace the logging we're
already doing, i.e. mce_log() with extlog or not.

Because if you want to replace the current logging you actually have to
exit machine_check_poll() after having done mce_ext_err_print() so that
the rest of the chain doesn't see the error.

And, does mce_ext_err_print only report DRAM ECC errors or other error
types too?

Btw, if we keep both, then we're going to have two tracepoints -
trace_mce_record() in mce_log() and this one - issuing each a record for
the same event. Which is not really what we want I'd say...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/