Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 17 (pinctrl-single.c)

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [131018 16:49]:
> * Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [131018 16:41]:
> > On 10/18/13 16:39, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > 
> > > Looks like we need a little bit of arch specific handling
> > > with the generic IRQ. Fix the issue with an ifdef the
> > > same way as other drivers do.
> > > 
> > > ARM needs things set to IRQF_VALID, which also then sets
> > > noprobe. Others seem to use just irq_set_noprobe().
> > > 
> > > Otherwise we can get:
> > > 
> > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c: In function 'pcs_irqdomain_map':
> > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c:1750:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 
> > Did you address this error?  I don't see a fix for it...
> 
> Yes set_irq_flags() is defined for ARM archs in
> arch/arm/include/asm/hw_irq.h which is included from
> include/linux/irq.h as <asm/hw_irq.h>. So the ifdef
> below takes care of that too.
> 
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > > +	set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> > > +#else
> > > +	irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> > > +#endif

OK I've sent the pull request and Olof has now pulled the fix
into arm-soc next/dt branch.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/